West Wales News Review

Economy, environment, sustainability

Carmarthenshire Plans for Thousands of Unwanted Homes

Carmarthenshire would become a mass of construction sites if the housing targets in the newly agreed Local Development Plan are to be met. The plan, which although only just finalised covers the years 2006 to 2021, allows for 13,895 new homes in the county between 2012 and 2021.

In the first six years of the plan, 2006 to 2012, only 1,883 new homes were built in the county, according to figures in Appendix 1 of the plan (link below). There is little demand from developers to build large estates:

  • Fewer potential buyers qualify for mortgages. Low incomes, part-time jobs and zero-hours contracts share a lot of the blame for this.
  • Employment in Carmarthenshire is heavily dependent on the public sector, which is axing jobs.
  • Loans to build social housing are not plentiful, housing benefit is under the cosh, and where exactly would thousands of new social housing occupants find work? In these conditions standard social housing is uneconomic to build without a big subsidy.

Not that the Local Development Plan envisages many thousands of ‘affordable’ homes. The maximum would be 2,133 of the 11,359 proposed, over the life of the plan, for the main growth areas of Carmarthen, Llanelli and Ammanford/ Cross Hands, the service centres of Burry Port/ Pembrey, Llandeilo, Llandovery, Newcastle Emlyn, St Clears and Whitland, and 11 local service centres.

The chart shows the numbers of homes which could be built in Carmarthenshire’s larger communities, and the maximum proportion of ‘affordable’ homes in each location


Source: Appendix A of the Carmarthenshire LDP inspector’s report

The definition of ‘affordable’ is woolly in any case. Rents are supposed to be no more than 80% of local market rents, and occupants have to qualify by virtue of incomes which are too low for local open-market housing. ‘Affordable’ seems to mean ‘provided with an element of public subsidy’. Not many affordable homes are planned for low-income Carmarthenshire, though.

Despite the capacity in the plan for 13,895 additional homes between 2012 and 2021, they are most unlikely all to be needed. The original estimates were based on population growth in the early 2000s, before the financial crash. In the most recent year for which we have figures, June 30th 2012 to June 30th 2013, the population of the whole of Wales rose only 8,345, and in Carmarthenshire the net increase was just 364. The existing population fell by 302 as births failed to keep pace with deaths. Incomers totalled a net 339 from other parts of the United Kingdom and 335 from other countries. The average household in the county contained 2.185 persons (statistically speaking) in 2011, so the extra 364 Carmarthenshire residents would have needed only 167 homes.

This demand is less than one-ninth of the 1,544 allowed in the plan for every single year between 2012 and 2021, and if it remains as low, should not result in the swamping of Welsh-speaking communities — provided that the Welsh-speakers of working age can find jobs, so they are not forced to migrate in search of employment.

Developers like clean flat land on which to construct three- and four-bedroomed houses for the government’s favourite demographic group, those ‘hard-working families’ with secure jobs and mortgages they can afford to repay. This is not the demand in Carmarthenshire, where ageing pensioners look for small bungalows and warden-assisted developments within their own communities. Bungalows are generally less profitable for developers than cram-them-in housing estates, and so they don’t get built.

Neither, at present, do the estates of ‘executive’ homes.

The village I live in, and others round about, have empty homes aplenty, several of them deteriorating rapidly. Given the low rate of population growth in the county, wouldn’t it be sensible to bring these empty dwellings back into use, using local firms to do the work, and thereby encourage people to move into established communities which are suffering from out-flight?

Appendix A – Council’s proposed changes recommended by Inspector

Pat Dodd Racher

Single Post Navigation

2 thoughts on “Carmarthenshire Plans for Thousands of Unwanted Homes

  1. Sian Caiach on said:

    I agree that the number of homes is ridiculous. In my ward Taylor Wimpy in Stradey Park have just cut to building on phase 4 of their plans about 6 years early [now renamed phase 1A] as the only demand they claim. is for 4 bedroomed homes and their 2 and 3 bed town houses are hard to shift.
    To add insult to injury we don’t actually have the facilities locally to treat the sewage from these already approved flood plain new homes. Welsh Water apparently reassured the inspector that there was capacity to treat the sewage from all the new homes. This is basically a lie. Yes, the sewage works has this capacity, but only if it switches over to a dry sewage model [ treating concentrated sewage only] and does not remain under the current Llanelli arrangement where practically every drainage area has combined surface water and sewage drainage, forcing hundreds of large discharges of untreated human toilet waste. To put the system right would cost around £3 billion and take up to 30 years. Ignoring the problem is Plan A.

    The County Council js renowned for not having a plan B. Plan B should surely be stop building houses until we have a sewage treatment system fit for purpose.
    The senior officers who have run Planning/Regeneration and Environmental “Protection” have made the decision, presumably informed of the issues, to Keep Mum and Carry On and hope that no one noticed.

    An extra 4,000 homes in Llanelli are hardly appropriate when we have more empty homes and projected depopulation of working age people if there is no miracle economic recovery to replace the jobs lost in this recession.

    However, the fact that an area is in the LDP labelled housing is not a green light to development with our serious environmental problems and no local demand. Time to wake up, Councillors of the planning committee. Time to use those brains before you rubber stamp what the officers tell you to do. You must know that you have consistently encouraged ecological disaster and human health risk in llanelli rather then challenge what you have been asked to do.

    The WLGA report tells you, the Councillors, to take control of decisions and policy and actually run the Council on behalf of your electorates. Do it, or step aside to let someone else get the job done.

    • Given the ageing population and the improbability of recovery, let alone one bringing well-paid permanent jobs in its wake, I reckon the county needs more dwellings designed (or changed)for people over about 75, and retrofitting of existing homes to make them as energy efficient as possible. Unfortunately the figures for housing requirements originate in London, and appear totally unrelated to local need! I agree that insufficient priority is given to drainage, but guess that’s what happens when you rely on remote people ticking boxes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: